4. Continued awareness development with local, county, state, federal officials on risk as the water issue remains overt for most of the region, while conflated in many local areas.
5. Integrated data sets combining interagency risk data with water flows, tables, watersheds, basins, additional; including but not limited to USGS and USACE publicly available data.
6. Continued advocacy for the municipalities and two-thirds of the towns and communities that do not have an independent public works, and the 67% of the population that does not have a municipality that represents them.
7. Reviewing risk of toxic contaminants, including but not limited to #5, #6, plus Sewage system devastation, EPA SuperFund sites that have been stagnant, Debris and Chemicals in the devastation that have mixed into the water and soil, toxic mud, impact of toxicity to public health and infrastructure, and resulting risk to local agriculture, business, and communities at large.